Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the service tax demand order, passed without according a reasonable opportunity of hearing, warranted interference and remand.
Analysis: The petitioner alleged that proceedings were not effectively brought to her notice and that the impugned order had been passed ex parte. The record also indicated that the show cause notice was not replied to and that personal hearing notices had not elicited a response. Even so, the Court found that a tax demand had been confirmed against a small-scale business without the petitioner having been heard, and that this justified interference.
Conclusion: The impugned order was quashed and the matter was remanded for reconsideration, with liberty to file a reply and a direction to grant a reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, before passing a fresh order.