Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, prior to 6 October 1988, Rule 57-I of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was subject to the limitation prescribed under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for recovery of wrongly availed Modvat credit.
Analysis: The demand for recovery was raised in April 1987, when Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not yet on the statute book. The provision was inserted only on 6 October 1988. Since the recovery action preceded the insertion of Section 11A, no statutory limitation governed the demand for recovery of the wrongly availed Modvat credit for that period.
Conclusion: The question is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Prior to 6 October 1988, Rule 57-I of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not subject to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for the demand in question.