<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 160 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76009</link>
    <description>Prior to 6 October 1988, recovery of wrongly availed Modvat credit under Rule 57-I of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not governed by the limitation in Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, because that provision was inserted only on 6 October 1988. As the demand in question was raised in April 1987, before Section 11A existed, no statutory limitation applied to that recovery action for the relevant period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 160 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76009</link>
      <description>Prior to 6 October 1988, recovery of wrongly availed Modvat credit under Rule 57-I of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not governed by the limitation in Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, because that provision was inserted only on 6 October 1988. As the demand in question was raised in April 1987, before Section 11A existed, no statutory limitation applied to that recovery action for the relevant period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>