Customs arrest compliance under Section 104 clarified as SLP is not pressed and issues remain open

A writ petition under Article 32 was withdrawn and dismissed on the petitioner's request. A Special Leave Petition was disposed of as not pressed, with a clarification that any arrest by customs authorities must comply with the statutory mandate of Section 104 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the principles stated in Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement. The Court recorded that all contentions and issues were left open for future adjudication and did not decide the merits of those questions.

---

---

Outcome: The writ petition under Article 32 was dismissed as withdrawn and the special leave petition was disposed of after the petitioner chose not to press it, with all contentions and issues left open.

---