Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account under Section 83(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, stated to have been made in 2020-21, had ceased to operate by virtue of Section 83(2) of the Act, and whether the bank could continue to block operation of the account on that basis.
Analysis: The attachment, if issued in 2020-21, could not remain operative beyond one year from the date of issue, as Section 83(2) provides for automatic cessation of a provisional attachment after that period. On the petitioner's own case, the attachment had neither been removed nor revived, and there was no material to indicate any later order affecting the account. In those circumstances, the earlier attachment had become inoperative by force of law.
Conclusion: The bank was directed not to interdict operation of the petitioner's bank accounts solely on the basis of the provisional attachment order passed under Section 83(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 in 2020-21.