TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Orders Release of Detained Goods and Vehicle Under CGST Act; Petitioner to Pursue Additional Claims Separately.</h1> <h3>M/s Fadil Enterprises Versus State of U.P. and Another</h3> The HC quashed the order detaining goods and the vehicle under the CGST Act, directing their release under Section 129(1)(a) within three weeks. The ... Detention of the goods and vehicle of the petitioner - whether the goods may be released by the authorities under Section 129(1)(a) or 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act? - HELD THAT:- The facts and issue in the present writ petition are quite similar to one in H/S HALDER ENTERPRISES VERSUS STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS [2023 (12) TMI 514 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT]. In light of the same, we see no reason why this Court should take a different view of the matter. Ergo, the goods would have to be released in terms of Section 129(1)(a) of the CGST Act. Accordingly, the order passed by the authorities dated July 27, 2024 is quashed and set aside. The authorities are directed to carry out the exercise in terms of Section 129(1)(a) of the CGST Act within a period of three weeks from today. The writ petition is allowed. The writ petition challenges detention of goods and vehicle under CGST Act. Petitioner seeks release of goods under Section 129(1)(a). Court quashes order, directs release under Section 129(1)(a) within three weeks. Other prayers can be pursued separately. Writ petition allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
