Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether late fee under section 234E of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be levied while processing TDS statements under section 200A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for periods prior to the insertion of section 200A(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 234E created liability for fee for delayed furnishing of TDS statements, but the mechanism for computing and adjusting that fee during processing under section 200A was introduced only when section 200A(1)(c) came into force. For the relevant assessment years, the processing provision did not authorise the Department to compute or levy the late fee at the stage of processing TDS returns. The amendment could not be applied retrospectively to validate the impugned intimations.
Conclusion: The levy of late fee in the impugned demand intimations was not sustainable and the challenge succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A fee under section 234E cannot be imposed during processing of TDS statements under section 200A for periods prior to the insertion of section 200A(1)(c), because the processing provision did not then authorise such computation or levy.