Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight charged separately in the sale invoices of excisable goods forms part of the assessable value for determination of central excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000.
Analysis: The invoice, purchase order and acknowledgment showed that the freight was charged separately over and above the price of the goods. The goods were cleared directly from the factory to the customers, without being sold from a depot or any other place of removal. In such a factory gate sale, the cost of transportation from the place of removal to the place of delivery is excluded from valuation where it is separately shown and recovered as freight. The factual matrix was found to align with the settled principle that the place of removal remained the factory gate and that separate freight in the invoice did not become part of the transaction value merely because the sale was on FOR basis.
Conclusion: Freight charged separately in the invoices was not includible in the assessable value, and the duty demand on that component was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: In a factory gate sale, transportation charges separately recovered and shown in the invoice are excluded from the assessable value for central excise purposes where the goods are delivered from the place of removal to the buyer and no contrary factual basis shows the buyer's premises to be the place of removal.