Uniform all-India excise pricing with equalised freight: whether depot transport costs can be added to assessable value-disallowed

The dominant issue was whether, under s. 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, where a manufacturer charges a uniform all-India price inclusive of equalised freight, the assessable value can be increased by adding transportation cost from the factory to depots on the footing that the "place of removal" definition was expanded. The SC held that s. 4 must be read holistically: the "normal price" is the price at the time and place of removal, and the enlargement of "place of removal" was to accommodate different prices at different removal points under the amended scheme, not to mandate addition of freight where the price is uniform. Applying the equalised freight principle, inclusion of such transportation cost was disallowed.

---

---

Issues: Whether, after the amendment to Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, where a manufacturer sells goods at a uniform price nationwide by including equalised freight, the Department is entitled to compute excise value by adding the cost of transportation from factory to depot.

Analysis: Section 4(1)(a) defines normal price as the price at which goods are ordinarily sold for delivery at the time and place of removal; the amended Section 4(ia) contemplates differing prices for different places of removal where applicable. The enlargement of the statutory definition of "place of removal" to include depots was introduced to give effect to differing prices at different places of removal and not to alter the valuation where a single uniform price (equalised freight included) is charged nationwide. Section 4(2) excludes the cost of transportation when price for delivery at place of removal is not known and value is determined with reference to price for delivery at another place. Reading Section 4 as a whole shows the normal price remains the price at time and place of removal; consequently, where the price is uniform across places of removal by virtue of equalised freight, the value for excise does not change merely because the statutory definition of place of removal was extended.

Conclusion: The Department is not entitled to add transportation cost from factory to depot to the excise value where the manufacturer charges a uniform price across the country by including equalised freight; the appeals are allowed in favour of the assessee.

---