Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight charges recovered from buyers for delivery of goods to their premises were includible in the assessable value for central excise duty.
Analysis: The Purchase Order showed an ex-works arrangement, and the invoices separately reflected freight. The place of removal has to be determined on the facts of each case, with the sale transaction and passing of property being relevant under the valuation framework. Insurance or freight borne by the manufacturer does not, by itself, determine the place of removal or establish that the buyer's premises is the place of removal. Under the governing valuation provisions and the Board's circulars, transportation cost beyond the place of removal is excludible where the goods are sold at the factory gate and handed over to the transporter without reservation of disposal rights. The facts also aligned with the earlier decision relied upon by the Tribunal, which held that delivery at the buyer's premises does not by itself make such premises the place of removal when the sale is on ex-works terms.
Conclusion: Freight charges were not includible in the assessable value, and the demand could not be sustained.