Permanent establishment under India-USA DTAA not established where subsidiary was not a fixed place, service, or agency PE.

The dispute concerned whether the assessee had a permanent establishment and business connection in India for the relevant year. The Tribunal applied earlier orders in the assessee's own case and accepted that the Indian subsidiary did not amount to a fixed place PE, service PE, or agency PE. It also found that the conditions for attribution under the India-USA DTAA were not satisfied. On that basis, the income-tax authorities were found to have erred in treating the assessee as having a PE in India, and the issue was resolved in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee had a permanent establishment and business connection in India for the year under consideration.

Analysis: The dispute on this issue was held to be covered by earlier orders in the assessee's own case. The finding adopted was that the Indian subsidiary did not constitute a fixed place PE, service PE, or agency PE, and that the conditions under the India-USA DTAA for attribution of a PE were not met. On that basis, the income-tax authorities were found to have erred in treating the assessee as having a PE in India.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee; the assessee was held not to have a permanent establishment or business connection in India.

---