Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (9) TMI 1033 - AT - FEMA

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Forex company wins appeal, gets seized Rs 11 lakh released; individual guilty of dollar premium sales The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA allowed the appeal by the forex company and dismissed the individual appellant's appeal regarding FEMA violations. The ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Forex company wins appeal, gets seized Rs 11 lakh released; individual guilty of dollar premium sales

                              The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA allowed the appeal by the forex company and dismissed the individual appellant's appeal regarding FEMA violations. The company successfully demonstrated that seized Indian currency of Rs. 11 lakhs was properly accounted for through bank records, and foreign currency holdings were adequately documented. The Tribunal found no contraventions by the company and ordered release of all seized currency. However, the individual appellant was found guilty of selling US dollars at premium rates to Nigerian HC officials. The Rs. 5 lakh penalty already deposited by the individual was deemed sufficient with no additional payment required.




                              Issues Involved:

                              1. Confiscation of foreign and Indian currency.
                              2. Imposition of penalties for contravention of FEMA, 1999.
                              3. Allegations of illegal dealings in foreign exchange.
                              4. Procedural lapses and natural justice concerns.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Confiscation of Foreign and Indian Currency:

                              The appeals were filed under Section 19 of FEMA, 1999 against an order dated 30.03.2017, which confiscated foreign and Indian currency recovered from the business premises of the appellant. The confiscated amounts included UK lb3690, AUS $100, Sing $1650, US $6116, and Rs.11 lakhs. The Adjudicating Authority concluded that the appellant failed to comply with RBI conditions under Section 10 and 47 of FEMA, 1999. The seized currency was alleged to be involved in illegal transactions, and the appellant did not maintain proper records as required by RBI guidelines.

                              2. Imposition of Penalties for Contravention of FEMA, 1999:

                              Penalties of Rs.5 lakhs on Sumesh Duggal and Rs.15 lakhs on M/s Duggal Forex Pvt. Ltd. were imposed for contraventions of FEMA, 2002. The Adjudicating Authority found that the appellants engaged in illegal dealings in foreign exchange, which included the acquisition, purchase, sale, and transfer of foreign exchange without proper authorization. The penalties were imposed under Section 13(2) of FEMA, 1999 for non-compliance with the conditions laid down by RBI.

                              3. Allegations of Illegal Dealings in Foreign Exchange:

                              The case facts revealed that on 21.05.2007, the Income Tax Department seized US $22,27,800 from Captain G.A. Ojedokun, who admitted to purchasing foreign currency from local markets at black market rates. Investigations indicated that Sumesh Duggal and M/s Duggal Forex Pvt. Ltd. were involved in these transactions. Statements recorded under Section 37 of FEMA, 1999 confirmed illegal transactions, including dealings with Nigerian High Commission officials. The evidence included call records and statements from various individuals, corroborating the illegal dealings in foreign exchange.

                              4. Procedural Lapses and Natural Justice Concerns:

                              The appellant argued that the Adjudicating Authority failed to provide details and copies of statements of persons involved, thus preventing a proper defense. The appellant also contended that the seized Indian currency was duly accounted for and withdrawn from the bank on the day of the search. The foreign currency was also claimed to be duly accounted for with supporting invoices. The appellant alleged that the statements recorded were not voluntary and were obtained under duress. The Adjudicating Authority was accused of not considering the appellant's replies and representations, leading to a violation of natural justice principles.

                              Judgment:

                              The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s Duggal Forex Pvt. Ltd., finding that the company had not committed any contravention as there was no irregularity in its accounts. The Indian and foreign currency seized from M/s Duggal Forex Pvt. Ltd. was directed to be released. The appeal filed by Sumesh Duggal was dismissed, affirming the penalty of Rs.5 lakhs, which had already been deposited as a pre-deposit for admitting the appeal. The Tribunal concluded that Sumesh Duggal was involved in illegal dealings in foreign exchange and upheld the confiscation of the seized currency. The judgment was pronounced on 8th July 2024.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found