TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>India's Supreme Court Grants Extension for Filing; Issues Notice to Unrepresented Respondents.</h1> <h3>M/s SSM EXPORTS Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX AND CGST & ORS.</h3> The SC of India condoned the delay in filing and issued a notice to the respondents. The bench, comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, ... Territorial Jurisdiction - Search and seizure - multiple agencies have carried out search operations - centralisation of investigation with DGGI, AZU - it was held by High Court that 'Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act has limited application and therefore, is not applicable to the facts of the present petitions. Similarly, the Circular dated 05.10.2018 also has no application to the facts of the present petitions.' HELD THAT:- Delay condoned. Issue notice to the respondents. The Supreme Court of India condoned delay and issued notice to the respondents in the case. The judges were Mrs. B.V. Nagarathna and Mr. Ujjal Bhuyan. Petitioner(s) were represented by Mr. Priyadarshi Manish and Mrs. Anjali Jha Manish, AOR. No representation for respondent(s).
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
