<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 169 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757925</link>
    <description>The SC of India condoned the delay in filing and issued a notice to the respondents. The bench, comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, heard the matter. The petitioner(s) were represented by their counsel, while the respondent(s) had no legal representation present at the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:17:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 169 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757925</link>
      <description>The SC of India condoned the delay in filing and issued a notice to the respondents. The bench, comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, heard the matter. The petitioner(s) were represented by their counsel, while the respondent(s) had no legal representation present at the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>