TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions, Condoning Delay and Concludes Proceedings Without Further Intervention.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CGST Versus DEEPAK KHANDELWAL</h3> The SC dismissed the special leave petitions, determining no interference was warranted under Art. 136 of the Indian Constitution. The delay in filing was ... Jurisdiction of proper officer to seize u/s 67 - Seizure of unaccounted assets - interpretation of statute - section 67 of GST Act - Seeking unconditional release of goods - two silver bars - Indian currency - Mobile Phones - legality of search and seizure of residential premises - it was held by High Court that 'The respondents are directed to forthwith release the currency and other valuable assets seized from the petitioner during the search proceedings conducted on 28.01.2020' - HELD THAT:- No case for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. SLP dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions as no interference was found necessary under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. Delay was condoned, and pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
