Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported laser imager was classifiable as an accessory solely or principally used with MRI equipment under Chapter 90 Note 2(b), or whether it was a multi-compatible accessory falling under Chapter 90 Note 2(c) of the Customs Tariff Act.
Analysis: The imported item was found to be a film printer and accessory for medical imaging machines, capable of interfacing with several digital modalities including MRI, CT, DR, CR and FFDM. The relevant test under Chapter 90 Note 2(b) was whether the goods were suitable for use solely or principally with a particular kind of machine or with machines of the same heading. Since the product was suitable for use with a variety of machines under different tariff headings, it could not be confined to MRI equipment alone. The alternative claim for classification as MRI apparatus also failed because the goods were commercially known and used as a printer accessory, not as the imaging apparatus itself.
Conclusion: Classification under Chapter 90 Note 2(b) was rejected and the goods were held classifiable under Chapter 90 Note 2(c) as other parts and accessories.