Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to interim release of the detained truck and goods on furnishing a bank guarantee, and whether the respondents could issue notice for penalty under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The petition was taken up only on the question of interim relief. The order noted the contention regarding non-service of notice and the respondents' stand that they should be left free to proceed under Section 129(3). Without recording any opinion on merits, the Court directed release of the vehicle and goods upon furnishing the specified bank guarantee and permitted the respondents to issue notice and proceed in accordance with law.
Outcome: Interim relief was granted by directing release of the vehicle and goods on furnishing a bank guarantee, while leaving the respondents at liberty to proceed under law.