<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 942 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757238</link>
    <description>Interim release of a detained truck and goods was directed on furnishing a specified bank guarantee, with no opinion expressed on the merits. The Court noted the dispute over alleged non-service of notice and accepted that the respondents could proceed under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act in accordance with law. The vehicle and goods were therefore released provisionally, while the tax authorities were left free to issue notice and continue penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 942 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757238</link>
      <description>Interim release of a detained truck and goods was directed on furnishing a specified bank guarantee, with no opinion expressed on the merits. The Court noted the dispute over alleged non-service of notice and accepted that the respondents could proceed under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act in accordance with law. The vehicle and goods were therefore released provisionally, while the tax authorities were left free to issue notice and continue penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>