Supreme Court Rejects Petition: No Grounds for Intervention, All Pending Applications Dismissed. The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition under Art. 136 of the Indian Constitution, finding no grounds for interference within its jurisdiction. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court Rejects Petition: No Grounds for Intervention, All Pending Applications Dismissed.
The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition under Art. 136 of the Indian Constitution, finding no grounds for interference within its jurisdiction. The bench, noting and condoning the delay, concluded that the petition lacked merit. Consequently, all pending applications associated with the case were disposed of accordingly.
Issues involved: Dismissal of Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, heard the petitioner's case represented by Mr. N Venkataraman, A.S.G., Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR, Mr. V Chandrashekhara Bharathi, Adv., Mrs. Aarushi Singh, Adv., and Mr. Siddharth Sinha. The court noted the delay, which was condoned, and proceeded to state that no grounds for interference were found within their jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed. Additionally, any pending applications were also disposed of as part of the judgment.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
