Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice and endorsement issued before expiry of the appeal period could be sustained, and whether the amount debited from the electronic credit ledger could be treated as the statutory pre-deposit for the proposed appeal.
Analysis: The order in original had been passed on 22.12.2023 and the statutory appeal period under Section 107 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act was available up to 22.04.2024. The notice dated 23.01.2024 and the endorsement dated 09.02.2024 were issued within that period. The record did not disclose any recorded reasons justifying waiver or curtailment of the appeal period under Section 78 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act. In these circumstances, the impugned actions were held to be illegal and arbitrary. The Court also accepted the request that the amount already debited from the electronic credit ledger be treated as the 10% pre-deposit for the appeal, with a direction that the appellate authority decide the appeal according to law without insisting on any further pre-deposit.
Conclusion: The notice and endorsement were quashed, the assessee was permitted to file the appeal within the stipulated time, and the amount debited from the electronic credit ledger was directed to be treated as the pre-deposit for that appeal.