https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754782 The HC allowed the petition, quashing the impugned Notice and Endorsement due to their premature issuance and lack of valid reasons under Section 78 of the KGST Act. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority by a specified date, with the debited amount treated as a pre-deposit, allowing the appeal to proceed without further pre-deposit requirements. The judgment underscored the petitioner's right to appeal within the statutory period and emphasized compliance with the KGST Act's provisions, particularly regarding the necessity for valid reasons when waiving appeal timelines. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754782 The HC allowed the petition, quashing the impugned Notice and Endorsement due to their premature issuance and lack of valid reasons under Section 78 of the KGST Act. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority by a specified date, with the debited amount treated as a pre-deposit, allowing the appeal to proceed without further pre-deposit requirements. The judgment underscored the petitioner's right to appeal within the statutory period and emphasized compliance with the KGST Act's provisions, particularly regarding the necessity for valid reasons when waiving appeal timelines. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754782