Tax Order Challenged: Personal Hearing Granted, Fresh Assessment Directed with Opportunity to Present Additional Evidence HC allowed petitioner's challenge to tax order, setting aside the original order and remanding for reconsideration. The court directed first respondent to ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tax Order Challenged: Personal Hearing Granted, Fresh Assessment Directed with Opportunity to Present Additional Evidence
HC allowed petitioner's challenge to tax order, setting aside the original order and remanding for reconsideration. The court directed first respondent to provide personal hearing and issue fresh order within two months, without being bound by previous observations. No costs were imposed, giving petitioner opportunity to present evidence on credit notes, freight charges, and input tax credit issues.
Issues involved: Challenge to an order in original u/s three issues - issuance of credit notes, freight charges, and Input Tax Credit availed.
Issuance of credit notes: Petitioner challenged the order stating that arguments were advanced previously and the matter was remanded to the assessing officer. Petitioner provided sample invoices and evidence of bifurcation of freight payments for the relevant unit. Counsel argued that the impugned order did not consider the documents submitted by the petitioner.
Freight charges: Respondent contended that tax demand was confirmed after evaluating evidence presented by the petitioner. Additional Government Pleader argued that the petitioner had sufficient opportunity to provide evidence and that such evidence should not be re-appraised in Article 226 proceedings. Input Tax Credit disallowed based on the items not qualifying for credit as per the impugned order.
Input Tax Credit availed: Petitioner challenged the denial of Input Tax Credit on certain items, arguing that the impugned order did not provide reasons for disallowing the credit. The order only mentioned that the credit was blocked under Section 17(5) without specifying the reasons for denial.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside for the three issues discussed and remanded for re-consideration. The first respondent was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within two months. The observations in the order were not binding on the first respondent during re-consideration. Case disposed of with no costs.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
