<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 296 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751115</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax order, setting aside the original order and remanding for reconsideration. The court directed first respondent to provide personal hearing and issue fresh order within two months, without being bound by previous observations. No costs were imposed, giving petitioner opportunity to present evidence on credit notes, freight charges, and input tax credit issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 296 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751115</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax order, setting aside the original order and remanding for reconsideration. The court directed first respondent to provide personal hearing and issue fresh order within two months, without being bound by previous observations. No costs were imposed, giving petitioner opportunity to present evidence on credit notes, freight charges, and input tax credit issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>