Tribunal Overturns Penalties on Immovable Property Renting, Allows Appeals on Construction and Commercial Services.

The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals related to Construction Service (CS) and Commercial Complex Service (CCS). It found the penalties under Sections 76 and 77 for Renting of Immovable Property Service (RIPS) unsustainable, referencing a judgment negating service tax liability for renting immovable property during the relevant period. Consequently, the penalties were annulled, and the appellant was granted any consequential benefits as per law.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Whether the Revenue is justified in levying penalty under Sections 76 & 77 for RIPSRs.
2. Whether the demand of service tax in respect of CS/CCS is correct for the period from April 2001 to September 2009Rs.

Issue 1 - Penalty under RIPS:
The Revenue alleged non-payment of Service tax on commercial rental income under immovable property service (RIPS) and issued Show Cause Notices. The appellant denied liability but paid the tax for RIPS. The Original Authority confirmed the demand in the Show Cause Notices. The appellant contended that the penalty imposed was the only issue of concern. The Tribunal referred to a judgment stating that there was no liability to service tax for renting immovable property during the relevant period. Considering the ongoing legal proceedings, the Tribunal set aside the penalty.

Issue 2 - Demand of service tax for CS/CCS:
The Revenue claimed non-payment of Service tax under Construction Service (CS) and Commercial Complex Service (CCS) for a specific period. The appellant argued that the demand was not valid based on a decision by the Hon'ble Apex Court. The Tribunal analyzed various orders supporting the appellant's stance and concluded that the demand for service tax under residential complex service was not sustainable. The Tribunal allowed the appeals concerning CS and CCS, citing precedents and legal interpretations.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals related to CS and CCS. The penalties imposed on the appellant were also deemed unsustainable and were consequently set aside. The appeals were allowed with any consequential benefits as per law.

---