Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Designated Committee could issue Form SVLDRS-3 without first issuing Form SVLDRS-2 and granting the declarant an opportunity of personal hearing where the amount payable under the scheme was disputed.
Analysis: Section 127 of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and Rule 6 of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme) Rules, 2019 require the Designated Committee, where it estimates the amount payable to be higher than the amount declared, to issue an estimate in Form SVLDRS-2 and afford an opportunity of personal hearing. The declarant had disputed the amount payable in the declaration itself. Issuing Form SVLDRS-3 straightaway, without following the statutory sequence and without hearing the declarant, deprived the declarant of the procedural safeguards contemplated by the Scheme and offended principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 without first issuing Form SVLDRS-2 and granting a personal hearing was impermissible, and the challenge succeeded in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned determination was set aside and the matter was sent back for fresh decision after compliance with the prescribed statutory procedure.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the amount payable under the Sabka Vishwas scheme is disputed, the Designated Committee must first issue the statutory estimate and provide a personal hearing before finalising the amount payable; bypassing that procedure renders the final form unsustainable.