Locus standi of Letter of Authority holder required before release of confiscated goods and remand for fresh consideration.

A Letter of Authority holder could seek release of confiscated goods only if the authority letter and licence terms supported a direct entitlement, because the holder acted merely as the licence-holder's agent and the goods remained the licence-holder's property. Since the authorities below had not examined the appellant's locus standi and the relevant records were unavailable, the matter required fresh consideration. The case was remanded to the Collector (Appeals) for a new decision on the appellant's standing and on the maintainability of the order of absolute confiscation.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Letter of Authority holder had locus standi to seek release of the confiscated goods and whether the matter required reconsideration in view of the terms of the Letter of Authority.

Analysis: The Letter of Authority expressly stated that the holder acted only as an agent of the licence-holder, that the imported goods remained the property of the licence-holder, and that the holder had no authority to dispose of the goods otherwise. On that basis, the claim for release by the Letter of Authority holder raised a basic issue as to entitlement which had not been examined by the authorities below. In the absence of the relevant records and since the issue of the appellant's locus standi had not been decided, a fresh consideration was necessary.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the Collector (Appeals) for fresh decision on the appellant's locus standi and the maintainability of the order of absolute confiscation.

Ratio Decidendi: A Letter of Authority holder, acting only as an agent under the licence conditions, cannot claim release of confiscated goods without first establishing locus standi consistent with the authority letter and the rights of the licence-holder.

---