Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the products in dispute, namely slotted panels, strips, corner plates, cladding sheets, partition plates and metal shoes, were correctly classifiable as parts of steel furniture under Item 40 of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The products were found to be components out of which storage racks and similar steel furniture could be fabricated. The fact that customers also used some of the components for cat walks, ladders, platforms or other industrial structures did not change their essential character as parts capable of being used for steel furniture. Decisions and trade references dealing with complete finished goods or with items not functioning as furniture were held to be inapplicable to parts of this kind.
Conclusion: The products were correctly classifiable as parts of steel furniture under Item 40 of the Central Excise Tariff, and the contrary view taken in appeal was wrong.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are identifiable as components normally used to fabricate steel furniture, they remain classifiable as parts of steel furniture even if they may also be capable of use in other structures.