Fixed cinema seats as fixtures rather than furniture raised the question of central excise duty liability.

Cinema seats fixed to the floor and adjoining seats were disputed as to whether they constituted furniture liable to central excise duty or fixtures forming part of the cinema hall. The materials state that the seats were installed in place, not readily movable, and could not be used elsewhere without dismantling, supporting the contention that permanently attached items may be treated as fixtures rather than furniture. No final adjudication or operative outcome is disclosed in the text.

---

---

Issues: Whether cinema seats fixed to the floor and adjoining seats were furniture liable to central excise duty, or fixtures forming part of the cinema hall and not exigible as furniture.

Analysis: The materials indicate a dispute over the character of the installed cinema seats. The petitioner's case was that the seats were unassembled, duty-paid materials that were fixed in place, not movable, and could not be used elsewhere without dismantling. Reliance was placed on the fixed nature of the seats and on the proposition that items permanently attached to a structure may be treated as fixtures rather than furniture.

Outcome: No final adjudication is disclosed in the provided text.

---