Industrial steel fixtures are not furniture where their dominant use is specialised factory equipment rather than ordinary movable furnishings.

Steel cabinets, tables, benches, racks, tool holders and work benches specially fabricated for factory use were not treated as steel furniture under Item No. 40. Applying commercial parlance and dictionary meaning, furniture denotes movable articles of convenience or decoration used in ordinary domestic, office or similar settings. Because these goods were heavy-gauge, often fixed or capable of fixation, and designed for specialised industrial functions such as storing tools, dies, components, welding, inspection and work support, their dominant character was industrial equipment rather than furniture. The department's reliance on resemblance to cupboards or tables was insufficient.

---

---

Issues: Whether the disputed steel cabinets, tables, benches, racks, tool holders, work benches and allied articles were classifiable as steel furniture under Item No. 40 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.

Analysis: The articles were found to be specially designed for use in the assessee's factory, made of heavy gauge steel, often fixed or capable of being fixed to the shop floor, and intended for storing tools, dies, components or for specialised workshop functions such as welding, inspection and work support. Applying the accepted meaning of furniture in dictionary sense and commercial parlance, furniture denotes movable articles of convenience or decoration used in houses, offices or public buildings. The reasoning accepted from prior authority was that an article ceases to be ordinary furniture where it is tailor-made to perform special functions, lacks the character of movable household or office furniture, and is not ordinarily used as such in the market. The features relied upon by the department, such as resemblance to cupboards, tables or racks, were held insufficient where the dominant character was that of specialised industrial equipment.

Conclusion: The disputed goods were not steel furniture and did not fall under Item No. 40 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.

Ratio Decidendi: An article is classifiable as furniture only if it is a movable article of convenience or decoration used in ordinary domestic, office or similar settings, and goods specially fabricated for industrial use with specialised functions and fixed installation do not answer that description.

---