Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Petitioner Granted Two-Month Stay to Challenge Orders: Temporary Relief from Enforcement</h1> <h3>INDIAN TRANSFORMERS LTD. Versus CEGAT MADRAS</h3> INDIAN TRANSFORMERS LTD. Versus CEGAT MADRAS - 1989 (42) E.L.T. 548 (Ker.) The petitioner filed a second appeal against orders Ext.P-1 and Ext.P-2. An application for dispensing with duty payment was conditionally allowed. Despite compliance, respondents demanded balance payment. The court held waiver of deposit does not stay duty collection but granted two months to seek stay from the Tribunal. Respondents were directed not to enforce Ext.P-1 for two months.