<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 239 - ERNAKULAM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74585</link>
    <description>An order dispensing with pre-deposit of duty does not, by itself, operate as a stay on recovery of the balance demand. Where an assessee may have proceeded on a bona fide understanding that the waiver order afforded interim protection, limited protection can be granted to preserve the status quo while the assessee approaches the Tribunal for stay. In this instance, recovery was kept in abeyance for two months, and the respondents were directed not to enforce the demand during that period, enabling the petitioner to seek appropriate interim relief before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 239 - ERNAKULAM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74585</link>
      <description>An order dispensing with pre-deposit of duty does not, by itself, operate as a stay on recovery of the balance demand. Where an assessee may have proceeded on a bona fide understanding that the waiver order afforded interim protection, limited protection can be granted to preserve the status quo while the assessee approaches the Tribunal for stay. In this instance, recovery was kept in abeyance for two months, and the respondents were directed not to enforce the demand during that period, enabling the petitioner to seek appropriate interim relief before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>