Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty paid kraft paper laminated with polyethylene amounts to manufacture and is liable to central excise duty again under Tariff Item 17(2).
Analysis: The process of treatment of paper was treated as manufacture in the binding precedent relied upon by the Court. The Court also noted the later Supreme Court ruling on paper subjected to various treatments and applied the same principle to laminated kraft paper. On that basis, the laminated product was regarded as falling within the tariff entry for paper subjected to treatment and not as the same goods for excise purposes.
Conclusion: The process of laminating duty paid kraft paper with polyethylene amounts to manufacture, and the resulting product is liable to central excise duty again under Tariff Item 17(2).
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty paid paper is subjected to a process that results in a commercially distinct treated product covered by the relevant tariff entry, the process constitutes manufacture for excise purposes and attracts duty again.