<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74274</link>
    <description>Duty-paid kraft paper laminated with polyethylene is treated as a commercially distinct processed product, so the laminating activity constitutes manufacture for central excise purposes. Applying prior precedent on treated paper, the laminated goods fall within the tariff entry for paper subjected to treatment and are not the same goods for excise purposes. The resulting product is therefore liable to central excise duty again under Tariff Item 17(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:13:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74274</link>
      <description>Duty-paid kraft paper laminated with polyethylene is treated as a commercially distinct processed product, so the laminating activity constitutes manufacture for central excise purposes. Applying prior precedent on treated paper, the laminated goods fall within the tariff entry for paper subjected to treatment and are not the same goods for excise purposes. The resulting product is therefore liable to central excise duty again under Tariff Item 17(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>