Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether electrodes used in electrolytic cells for manufacture of caustic soda were eligible as "inputs" for benefit under Notification No. 201/79-C.E., and whether the notification required the item to be raw material directly entering the final product.
Analysis: The notification was held to use the expression "inputs" in a wide sense, extending beyond raw materials to goods falling under Tariff Item 68 that are used in the manufacture of other excisable goods. The electrodes, though forming part of the electrolytic cell, were found to participate directly in the manufacturing process, to be consumed over time, and to have a clear nexus with the production of caustic soda. The later amendment by Notification No. 105/82-C.E. was also viewed as consistent with this broader understanding of the exemption.
Conclusion: The electrodes were eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 201/79-C.E., and the Revenue's objection was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of Notification No. 201/79-C.E., goods falling under Tariff Item 68 are not confined to raw materials; any such goods used in relation to and with nexus to the manufacture of the finished excisable product qualify as inputs if they participate in the manufacturing process.