Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether silica coated release paper used in the lamination process qualified as an input for Modvat credit under Rule 57A and was not excluded as an appliance or equipment.
Analysis: The Bench noted that an input need not form an integral part of the final product if it is used in relation to manufacture. On the record, the department produced no material to show that silica coated release paper was regarded as an appliance or equipment in technical or commercial parlance. The paper was treated as paper for customs purposes, and the exclusion clause could not be attracted on that basis alone. Following the earlier Tribunal view on the meaning of appliance or equipment, the Bench held that the release paper did not fall within the excluded category.
Conclusion: The release paper was an eligible input and Modvat credit was correctly availed; the challenge on merits failed.