Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application for dispensing with pre-deposit of duty and penalty and for stay of recovery should be allowed in full or only to a limited extent.
Analysis: The application was considered under Section 35F. The amount of duty and penalty was examined in the light of the rival submissions, and the Tribunal directed a substantial cash deposit while granting relief against the balance. On deposit of the specified amount, recovery of the remaining duty and penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.
Conclusion: The application was allowed in part by requiring a cash deposit of Rs. 4 lakhs and dispensing with pre-deposit of the balance duty and penalty.