Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the property allotted to a daughter under a family settlement and Stridhan arrangement was liable to gift-tax.
Analysis: The family settlement was entered into to resolve possible disputes and reallocate joint family properties among members. The daughter had been allotted the property under the settlement, and the subsequent Stridhan arrangement at marriage was treated as giving effect to that earlier family arrangement. The amended Hindu Succession law in Tamil Nadu conferred coparcenary rights on daughters in Mitakshara joint family property, and the arrangement was consistent with those rights. A bona fide family arrangement recognising antecedent claims and effecting realignment of family property does not amount to a transfer for gift-tax purposes.
Conclusion: The property allotment did not constitute a gift and was not exigible to gift-tax; the finding was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed because the impugned allotment was treated as a valid family arrangement implemented in accordance with the daughter's coparcenary entitlement and therefore outside the charge of gift-tax.
Ratio Decidendi: A bona fide family arrangement, made to preserve family peace and recognise antecedent rights, and effecting an allotment consistent with the statutory coparcenary rights of a daughter, does not amount to a taxable gift.