<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 293 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, confirming that the property transfer to Smt. D. Janaki was part of a valid family settlement and Stridhan agreement, in compliance with the Hindu Succession (Tamilnadu Amendment) Act, 1989. The transfer was not deemed a gift under the Gift-tax Act and was not subject to capital gains tax, aligning with the CGT(A)&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:23:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 293 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, confirming that the property transfer to Smt. D. Janaki was part of a valid family settlement and Stridhan agreement, in compliance with the Hindu Succession (Tamilnadu Amendment) Act, 1989. The transfer was not deemed a gift under the Gift-tax Act and was not subject to capital gains tax, aligning with the CGT(A)&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>