Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction for the provision made towards gratuity for worker-members, and whether such liability could be claimed outside the statutory limits of section 36(1)(v) and section 40A(7) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The provision for gratuity was held to fall within the statutory scheme governing deductions for employee gratuity liabilities. The expression "employees" was not confined so narrowly as to exclude the worker-members in the assessee-society's establishment, particularly when the assessee itself had treated them as employees for gratuity-related purposes. The claim also failed because there was no approved gratuity fund and the requirements of the relevant deduction provisions were not satisfied. The general contention that the co-operative authorities had declared the net profit could not override the method of computation mandated by the Income-tax Act, 1961. Since the special provisions governing gratuity deductions were not complied with, the claim could not be allowed under the general income-computation provision.
Conclusion: The deduction for provision made towards gratuity was not allowable, and the assessee's claim failed.