TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the gift-tax liability borne by the donees could be deducted while determining the market value of the gifted shares for gift-tax purposes. (ii) Whether the arrangement under the gift deeds made the transfers onerous gifts or gifts for inadequate consideration so as to justify deduction of the gift-tax liability from the value of the property.
Issue (i): Whether the gift-tax liability borne by the donees could be deducted while determining the market value of the gifted shares for gift-tax purposes.
Analysis: The market value has to be ascertained on the basis of what the asset would fetch in the open market on the date of the gift. The liability to pay gift-tax arises only after the gift is completed and does not exist as an encumbrance on the property at the time of transfer. A stipulation in the gift deed that the donees would bear the donor's gift-tax liability does not convert that liability into a charge or mortgage on the gifted property, nor does it reduce the market value of the shares.
Conclusion: The deduction claimed on account of gift-tax borne by the donees is not allowable and the valuation cannot be reduced on that basis.
Issue (ii): Whether the arrangement under the gift deeds made the transfers onerous gifts or gifts for inadequate consideration so as to justify deduction of the gift-tax liability from the value of the property.
Analysis: The transfers were not gifts under a single composite transfer burdened with an obligation within the meaning of section 127 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, nor were they separate independent transfers falling within that provision. The obligation undertaken by the donees to bear the donor's tax liability was not treated as consideration reducing the value of the gift. The statutory concept of gift under the gift-tax law did not permit the tax liability to be treated as deductible consideration in these facts.
Conclusion: The transfers were not onerous gifts and the gift-tax liability undertaken by the donees did not justify any deduction from the taxable value.
Final Conclusion: The valuation adopted by the Gift-tax Officer was restored and the assessee's claim for deduction of the gift-tax liability was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: A liability to pay gift-tax, even if undertaken by the donee under the gift deed, does not depress the open market value of the gifted property because it arises only on completion of the gift and is not an existing encumbrance or deductible consideration.
TaxTMI 
