<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 133 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70091</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the market value of gifted shares should not be reduced by gift-tax liability reimbursed by donees. The decision in CGT v. Muthukumaraswamy Mudaliar was deemed binding, rejecting the argument that gift-tax paid by donees could be considered as consideration. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, restoring the valuation made by the Gift-tax Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:27:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 133 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70091</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the market value of gifted shares should not be reduced by gift-tax liability reimbursed by donees. The decision in CGT v. Muthukumaraswamy Mudaliar was deemed binding, rejecting the argument that gift-tax paid by donees could be considered as consideration. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, restoring the valuation made by the Gift-tax Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>