Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 35(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for a payment made to an approved scientific research foundation out of earlier savings and not out of the current year's taxable income.
Analysis: The allowance under section 35(1)(ii) is a statutory deduction in the computation of business or professional income and is a bounty or concession granted by the Legislature to promote scientific research. The only threshold condition in the provision is that the assessee must pay a sum to an approved scientific research association or institution. No further requirement exists that the payment must arise only from current year income or from income chargeable to tax. Once the statutory condition of payment to an approved institution is satisfied, the provision must be applied liberally to give effect to the legislative objective. The parallel reference to section 80GGA did not defeat the claim, because the assessee had professional income and was entitled to seek the higher benefit available under section 35(1)(ii).
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction under section 35(1)(ii); the disallowance by the lower authorities was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a deduction provision for approved scientific research requires only payment to a recognised institution, no additional condition that the payment must come from current taxable income can be imported into the statute.