Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rectification order passed under section 154 could be sustained when the alleged error in not allowing depreciation and extra shift allowance was not a mistake apparent from the record.
Analysis: The assessment had been completed without depreciation because no claim was made by the assessee. The later rectification orders were passed to alter the computation of income by allowing depreciation and then extra shift allowance. The matter had already been found to be highly debatable, and a debatable question cannot be corrected under section 154. On the same reasoning, the subsequent rectification order could not stand.
Conclusion: The rectification order was invalid and was rightly cancelled.