<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 150 - ITAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68934</link>
    <description>A rectification order under section 154 cannot be used to introduce depreciation or extra shift allowance where no depreciation claim was made in the original assessment and the issue is debatable. A matter that requires debate or fresh computation is not a mistake apparent from the record, so rectification is outside section 154. The later rectification order therefore could not be sustained and was cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:14:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 150 - ITAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68934</link>
      <description>A rectification order under section 154 cannot be used to introduce depreciation or extra shift allowance where no depreciation claim was made in the original assessment and the issue is debatable. A matter that requires debate or fresh computation is not a mistake apparent from the record, so rectification is outside section 154. The later rectification order therefore could not be sustained and was cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>