Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1980 (7) TMI 150 - AT - Wealth-tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Partnerships Processing Raw Materials Deemed Industrial Undertakings for Wealth-tax Exemption The Tribunal determined that partnerships engaging in processing raw materials into finished products qualify as industrial undertakings under Section ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Partnerships Processing Raw Materials Deemed Industrial Undertakings for Wealth-tax Exemption

                          The Tribunal determined that partnerships engaging in processing raw materials into finished products qualify as industrial undertakings under Section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act. Therefore, the value of the assessees' interests in such firms is exempt from wealth-tax. The departmental appeals were dismissed, and the assessees' appeals were allowed, confirming the exemption of the interest value in partnership firms from wealth-tax under the specified provision.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Treatment of the value of interest in partnership firms for the levy of wealth-tax.
                          2. Definition and qualification of "industrial undertaking" under Section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Treatment of the Value of Interest in Partnership Firms for the Levy of Wealth-Tax:
                          The primary issue in these consolidated appeals is the treatment of the value of the interest that the assessees have in certain partnership firms for the levy of wealth-tax. The contention revolves around whether such partnerships can be classified as "industrial undertakings" under Section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, and its Explanation. If they qualify, the value of such interest would be exempt from wealth-tax.

                          2. Definition and Qualification of "Industrial Undertaking" under Section 5(1)(xxxii):
                          The core of the dispute lies in the interpretation of what constitutes an "industrial undertaking." The Tribunal had conflicting opinions in previous cases. One view held that a partnership must own machinery to be considered an industrial undertaking, while another view allowed for partnerships that get raw materials processed in mills owned by others to qualify as industrial undertakings.

                          Relevant Facts and Legal Provisions:
                          - The AAC had exempted the value of the interest of the assessee based on the Tribunal's view in WTA Nos. 20 & 21/Mds/76-77, which was favorable to the assessees.
                          - The contrary view, expressed in WTA No. 305/Mds/1975-76, favored the Revenue and was also considered by the AAC in some cases, leading to decisions against the assessees.

                          Analysis of Section 5(1)(xxxii) and Explanation:
                          - Section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act provides an exemption for the value of the interest of the assessee in the assets of an industrial undertaking belonging to a firm.
                          - The Explanation to the section defines "industrial undertaking" as an entity engaged in the business of generation or distribution of electricity, construction of ships, manufacture or processing of goods, or mining.

                          Tribunal's Interpretation:
                          - The Tribunal analyzed the term "industrial undertaking" and concluded that the engagement in the manufacture or processing of goods includes getting goods manufactured or processed under the supervision or control of the firm, even if the actual work is done in mills owned by others.
                          - The Tribunal emphasized that the commercial expediencies and economic efficiencies justify such arrangements. The firm's involvement in supervision and control over the manufacturing process qualifies it as an industrial undertaking.

                          Case Examples and Precedents:
                          - The Tribunal referred to the case of Hindustan Motors, where components are manufactured by ancillary units but still considered part of the manufacturing process of Hindustan Motors.
                          - The Tribunal also considered a decision of the Bombay Bench-D of the Tribunal in Smt. Kancanbai Champalal vs. 4th WTO, which supported the view that a firm need not manufacture goods by itself to qualify for the exemption.
                          - The Supreme Court's decision in CST vs. Dr. Sukh Deo was cited, where it was held that a manufacturer includes a person under whose direction or control goods are manufactured.

                          Conclusion:
                          - The Tribunal concluded that partnerships that buy raw materials and get them processed into finished products, such as oil or gold ornaments, by paying conversion charges, qualify as industrial undertakings.
                          - Consequently, the value of the interest of the assessees in such firms is eligible for exemption under Section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.

                          Judgment:
                          - The departmental appeals were dismissed, and the assessees' appeals were allowed, affirming that the value of the interest in the partnership firms is exempt from wealth-tax under the specified provision.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found