Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in computing income from house property, the assessee was entitled to deduction for repairs at one-sixth of the annual letting value under section 24(1)(i)(a), on the footing that the cost of repairs was to be borne by the owner and not by the tenant.
Analysis: The tenancy correspondence showed that the tenant undertook only to maintain and preserve the premises and to make good damage caused by its neglect, while excluding normal wear and tear. This meant that the tenant had not assumed the cost of ordinary repairs. In the absence of a specific contractual allocation, the statutory obligation under section 20 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950, required the owner to keep the premises in good and tenantable repair except where the tenant had undertaken to keep the premises in repair. On that basis, the liability for repairs remained with the assessee.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction of one-sixth of the annual letting value towards repairs under section 24(1)(i)(a).
Final Conclusion: The disallowance of the claim for repair deduction was set aside and the assessee succeeded in full on the house-property computation issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the tenant has not undertaken to bear the cost of ordinary repairs and the owner remains statutorily liable to keep the premises in tenantable repair, the assessee is entitled to the statutory repair deduction in computing income from house property.