Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, following the mercantile system of accounting, was entitled to deduction of the provision made for sales-tax liability in the relevant accounting year, notwithstanding that part of the liability was quantified or adjusted at a later stage and that refund might become due in respect of export or inter-State sales.
Analysis: The assessee followed the mercantile method and had provided for sales-tax and purchase-tax liabilities arising from purchases and sales made during the year. The statutory scheme showed that the liability under the sales-tax law arose when taxable purchases and sales took place, while any refund in respect of export or out-of-State sales was a later adjustment and did not postpone the accrual of the primary liability. The provision was therefore not a mere contingent liability. On accrual principles, a fiscal liability under a statute is deductible in the year in which the relevant transaction giving rise to the liability occurs, even if final quantification or actual payment occurs later.
Conclusion: The deduction was allowable in the relevant year and the addition made on account of the sales-tax provision was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the mercantile system of accounting, a statutory sales-tax liability is deductible in the year in which it accrues on the relevant transactions, and later quantification or refund does not make it contingent.