Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1979 (9) TMI 104

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of Rs. 10,636 which was actually paid during the accounting year. Second was a provision of sales tax amounting to Rs. 75,900. When asked to explain reason for making this provision, the assessee submitted the provision had to be made under the law, though if the product was exported out of India, he was entitled to refund of sales tax in respect of the value of the exported material. Since during the year the assessee was not sure about the prospective quantity of export, he made a provision for payment of sales-tax. 4. The ITO held that as there was no statutory compulsion on the part of the assessee to pay sales tax ''at present'', this provision was only a contingent one and, therefore, the same could not be allowed as expenditure. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to show that the method of accounting followed by the assessee was mercantile. The assessment order for the year under appeal is silent about the method of accounting adopted by the assessee. This appears to be a slip on the part of the ITO. However, assessment order for asst. yr. 1976-77 (copy filed) shows that the Department accepted the assessee's method of accounting as mercantile. 9. The assessee entitled to compute his profits and gains of business on accrual basis. The question with regard to the liability of an assessee following mercantile system of accounting for Sales-tax was considered by the Supreme Court in Kedar Nath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd vs. CIT (1). Their Lordships observed as follows. '' That the moment a dealer....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....General ST Act and r. 49-A of the M.P. General ST Rules, 1959. s. 7 provides for levy of purchases tax. The chart of page 1 of the compilation filed by the assessee shows provision of purchase tax amounting to 41,643 @ 3 per cent. Further, sales tax of Rs.26,209 on sales of crushed bones @ 3 per cent was also provided in the profit & loss account. Addl. sales tax levy and sales tax on bardana at 1.5 per cent and 10 per cent respectively was also provided for. 11. The sales tax assessment order for this accounting period has been filed before us. It appears from this order that the STO worked out that sales under export, inter-state sales and sales within the state separately. After excluding sales under export and inter-state sales, he c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....provided for his sales tax liability in the profits and loss accounts, he was not in a position to ascertain the precise amount of refund which he was entitled to get in respect of export sales and the inter state sales. The liability thus was not a contingent liability but a definite statutory liability which had arisen as soon as the assessee made purchases and effected sales. The amount of refund was not quantified during the year and, therefore, the assessee could not indicate such an amount of the credit side of the profit and loss account. This, however, did not detract from the fact that the assessee had properly provided for his statutory liability under the ST Act. In CIT vs. Brigmohan Das Laxmen Das (2), the High Court observed as....