Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payments made to the non-resident service provider for supplying software personnel were chargeable to tax in India as fees for technical services or fees for included services under the India-US DTAA, and whether the assessee was liable to deduct tax at source under sections 195, 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payments flowed from the agreement between the assessee and the non-resident manpower supplier, and the documents showed that the remittances were for supply of personnel at a specified hourly rate. There was no material to show that any technical knowledge, skill, experience, plan or design was made available to the assessee so as to satisfy the treaty's make available requirement. The services were found to be akin to recruitment or placement services rather than technical services, and the treaty provisions being more beneficial prevailed over section 9(1)(vii). As the underlying remittances were not chargeable to tax in India, the obligation to deduct tax at source did not arise.
Conclusion: The payments were not taxable in India under the DTAA as fees for included services, and the assessee was not in default for failure to deduct tax at source.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed and the deletion of the demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where payments to a non-resident are only for manpower supply and no technical knowledge, skill or design is made available to the payer, the amounts are not taxable as fees for included services under the applicable tax treaty and no withholding obligation arises.