Make available test limits treaty taxability of support fees, manpower charges, and research subscriptions under the India-USA DTAA.

Managerial support and manpower supply payments were not taxable as fees for included services under the India-USA DTAA because the arrangements did not satisfy the "make available" test in Article 12(4)(b); the recipient obtained support and personnel, but no technical knowledge, skill, know-how or processes capable of independent future use. Receipts from database subscriptions and customised research advisory were not royalty because they involved only use of published research materials or provision of advisory outputs, with no transfer of copyright or database rights. For the same non-resident payer, interest under sections 234B and 234C was not chargeable where tax, if any, was deductible at source by the Indian payer.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether management fee received for support services rendered to the Indian subsidiary was taxable as fees for included services under the India-USA DTAA; (ii) Whether inter-company labour charges for supply of manpower were taxable as fees for included services under the India-USA DTAA; (iii) Whether receipts from third-party clients for database subscription and customised research advisory were taxable as royalty; and (iv) Whether interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was chargeable.

Issue (i): Whether management fee received for support services rendered to the Indian subsidiary was taxable as fees for included services under the India-USA DTAA.

Analysis: The services under the master support arrangement were managerial and support in nature, covering oversight, marketing, finance, human resources, information technology, training and legal assistance. Such services did not involve transfer of technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes, nor did they enable the recipient to apply any such technology independently in future. The "make available" requirement in Article 12(4)(b) was therefore not satisfied.

Conclusion: The management fee was not taxable as fees for included services under the treaty and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether inter-company labour charges for supply of manpower were taxable as fees for included services under the India-USA DTAA.

Analysis: The manpower arrangement was only for lending personnel when group entities had excess or shortage of staff. The recipient obtained manpower support, but no technical or consultancy service was rendered so as to make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes. The arrangement was therefore outside Article 12(4)(b).

Conclusion: The inter-company labour charges were not taxable as fees for included services under the treaty and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether receipts from third-party clients for database subscription and customised research advisory were taxable as royalty.

Analysis: Subscription to published research materials amounted only to use of copyrighted articles and did not confer any right to use copyright. The customised research advisory was rendered by email or presentation and did not involve any grant of database access or transfer of copyright. The receipts therefore did not fall within the royalty article of the treaty.

Conclusion: The receipts from database subscription and customised research advisory were not taxable as royalty and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iv): Whether interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was chargeable.

Analysis: The assessee was a non-resident and the tax was to be collected, if at all, through withholding at source from the Indian payer. In such a situation, levy of interest for failure to pay advance tax was not warranted.

Conclusion: Interest under sections 234B and 234C was not chargeable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The tribunal held that the disputed receipts were not taxable in the manner adopted by the revenue and deleted the related additions, with consequential relief on interest.

Ratio Decidendi: For treaty purposes, consultancy or support payments are taxable as fees for included services only when they make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the recipient, and mere managerial support, manpower supply, or access to copyrighted research materials does not satisfy that test.

---